![]() If staff relies on your assumption alone, and not the legally required infringement notice, they will very likely be deleting accounts of good Flickr citizens who own and created the content. There is in fact every chance that the person posting content here is the owner of the content and also owns the 500px or other 3rd party sites the content is coming from. So you cannot assume that just because there is an IFTTT stamp and link, that the content has been copied without permission. And the intent of the recipe is to allow a user to move their own photos around to different photo storage/sharing sites automagically. ![]() The IFTTT recipe automagically includes those links with the upload. That is not accurate and a very dangerous assumption to make (if your hand is on the "delete account" button). Rule-wise that is not difficult: they do not need individual reports from the various photographers who find their work displayed here in that way - by linking back to the work and including the IFTTT tag the person who reposts already acknowledges they are not the owner of the photos.Ĭan you FlickrMail me the URL to the account in question?īy linking back to the work and including the IFTTT tag the person who reposts already acknowledges they are not the owner of the photos. It is time Flickr cleans up and removes these accounts fooling around with IFTTT on here. No response and the account is still there. I did the same for one account that is collecting several pictures from 500px. MabelAmber® ***Pluto5339*** Queen of Streetshots: MabelAmber***Pluto5339***MysteryGuest edited this topic 93 months ago. I have reported a few of these which employ an IFTTT recipe, but Flickr has not acted upon each report. Some of these people have posted hundreds thousands of 500 px photos in this way which get on here using the IFTTT recipe. I see that more often recently, people nabbing shots from 500 px to then post them on their Flickr account including a link to the source below the photo, namely the photopage on 500 px where it shows up in the original photographer's account. Kmacgray edited this topic 93 months ago. You also need to remove their name from the title of your post. It can be seen as harrassment and could get your own account in trouble. Waferbaby (staff) edited this topic 93 months ago.įirst, you need to remove the link to their account from your post. Please advice me what steps do I need to take. The following person () has stolen my image from 500px and put it under his name.ĥ/photo/96048729/invisible-o-by-kombizz-kashani How can I see now, which of my photos aren't in albums and without tags ? Suspiciously High View Count for Just One Photo What is Flickr's policy regarding DALL-E generated images? Welcome to the Flickr Help Forum! Click here to get started and to read ourĪccount restricted and search photos disabledīug detected - Photos show up twice during upload Flickr forever: Creating the safest most inclusive This thread was closed automatically due to a lack of responses over the last month.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |